i still think a really nice classic is best..in looks atleast...a late 4 door in black..
i know i have 2 doors,but thats cos i can..but i recon "snot" (cos its green and always runs) my off road 4 door is better looking..though gets less comments than the 2 doors..
I do agree with those who think yhe l322,is the best looking RR , next to the classic of course,But if I "had to" go away for x-mas in the new one then....
I also think it´s wrong to name the (very good looking) evoque "Range Rover" , it would be enough name it Evoque, It´s a good looking city suv , but it´s no RR.
I do agree with those who think yhe l322,is the best looking RR , next to the classic of course,But if I "had to" go away for x-mas in the new one then....
I also think it´s wrong to name the (very good looking) evoque "Range Rover" , it would be enough name it Evoque, It´s a good looking city suv , but it´s no RR.
imo the evoque shouldn't wear a range rover badge at all :amen:
As we've all seen, JLR is now one of the most profiable makers in the world.......why?
P
ive had my say whats yours
Indeed.
It's just a Freelander2. ...... with less room![]()
![]()
True, but if the rebadged Freelander keeps yummie mummies out of driving 2.5 tonne vehicles they barely have control over - it's worth smearing the marque.
Looks OK in the flesh IMO, certainly less of a fat arse than an L322, bit academic though, if I had that kind of money an L405 is not what I would spend it on, the list of gizmo's that the L405 has that I do not want would fill a pageLooks heavy bodied .. I prefer the older style where they look to have more window space than body space. Looks unbalanced, though I guess it could be tha camera angle.