Or climate science.
We all know that climate science is genuine. It's genuineness depends on the size of the research grant given. The more you are willing to say that natural climate change is man made the larger the grant.
Or climate science.
Seems alright to me.So if the majority vote to accept a cockup it becomes an "How to". Have you seen how the "Likes" system is progressing?
Considering nobody bothers to vote it's a bit of a moot point. It's a little obvious that if there was disagreement from members with respected knowledge then poll results would be irrelevant but it was an attempt to engage respected members in the process of choosing How To's.
Most chose not to bother.
Can I vote to have the old forum layout back please
We all know that climate science is genuine. It's genuineness depends on the size of the research grant given. The more you are willing to say that natural climate change is man made the larger the grant.
Has anyone worked out how much CO and CO2 is released when a 1000 lb bomb is dropped?
You are a bit precious. Are you an events planner?It's taken a lot to get me back here, after being told by a person identified only by a nickname (Tony, I think is his real name), that I would have already known what I discovered if I had "bothered to read" a "how to" which he had once contributed. I thought that I hadn't originally posted to be "abused", only to offer help to anyone who might benefit from my experiences and let's face it, who needs to be told off? So, I have spent many hours searching for the elusive posts of which he spoke, to do with "Testbook data, bit counts side to side". I have been unable to find any reference either in Rave or Testbook data regarding my findings but of course I am not inclined to say that therefore no other source of this information pre-dates my "discovery". Funny saga, this one, I found in my searching that others had had similar experiences prior to mine with being "told off" and in fact by comparison, my example doesn't really seem worth a mention, it pales into insignificance. I accept that my shortcomings have prevented my finding "Wammers"' aforementioned "how to" information. I have found plenty of other useful information within this site and will undoubtedly continue to do so in future. I'm sure that it must be tedious seeing questions repeated but surely not responding is preferable to belittling. Oh, that's right, mine was not a question, was it? Perhaps someone may benefit from other findings which I have made one day. Would I dare to post again? Hmm .. John..(my real name)
It's taken a lot to get me back here, after being told by a person identified only by a nickname (Tony, I think is his real name), that I would have already known what I discovered if I had "bothered to read" a "how to" which he had once contributed. I thought that I hadn't originally posted to be "abused", only to offer help to anyone who might benefit from my experiences and let's face it, who needs to be told off? So, I have spent many hours searching for the elusive posts of which he spoke, to do with "Testbook data, bit counts side to side". I have been unable to find any reference either in Rave or Testbook data regarding my findings but of course I am not inclined to say that therefore no other source of this information pre-dates my "discovery". Funny saga, this one, I found in my searching that others had had similar experiences prior to mine with being "told off" and in fact by comparison, my example doesn't really seem worth a mention, it pales into insignificance. I accept that my shortcomings have prevented my finding "Wammers"' aforementioned "how to" information. I have found plenty of other useful information within this site and will undoubtedly continue to do so in future. I'm sure that it must be tedious seeing questions repeated but surely not responding is preferable to belittling. Oh, that's right, mine was not a question, was it? Perhaps someone may benefit from other findings which I have made one day. Would I dare to post again? Hmm .. John..(my real name)
Missing Datatek? Surely we're overdue an EAS MOSFETs battle by now?!
Most of us struggle anyway.![]()
John,don't take anything to heart,by what is said on here,just carry on posting your finds,some people are blunt in their replies,others are not,such is life.It's taken a lot to get me back here, after being told by a person identified only by a nickname (Tony, I think is his real name), that I would have already known what I discovered if I had "bothered to read" a "how to" which he had once contributed. I thought that I hadn't originally posted to be "abused", only to offer help to anyone who might benefit from my experiences and let's face it, who needs to be told off? So, I have spent many hours searching for the elusive posts of which he spoke, to do with "Testbook data, bit counts side to side". I have been unable to find any reference either in Rave or Testbook data regarding my findings but of course I am not inclined to say that therefore no other source of this information pre-dates my "discovery". Funny saga, this one, I found in my searching that others had had similar experiences prior to mine with being "told off" and in fact by comparison, my example doesn't really seem worth a mention, it pales into insignificance. I accept that my shortcomings have prevented my finding "Wammers"' aforementioned "how to" information. I have found plenty of other useful information within this site and will undoubtedly continue to do so in future. I'm sure that it must be tedious seeing questions repeated but surely not responding is preferable to belittling. Oh, that's right, mine was not a question, was it? Perhaps someone may benefit from other findings which I have made one day. Would I dare to post again? Hmm .. John..(my real name)
John,don't take anything to heart,by what is said on here,just carry on posting your finds,some people are blunt in their replies,others are not,such is life.