Who cares, everyone to his own.
Only reason I commented was surprise at the expletive due to some harmless
leg pulling.
"Mahindra" <Mahindra@mahindra.com> wrote in message
news:KwcEc.48$m14.1@newsfe4-gui...
>
> "Hirsty's" <magnum.458@ntlworld.com> wrote in message
> news:WwYDc.176$d%4.97@newsfe2-gui.server.ntli.net...
> > Do these go together ??
> >
> > > Stupid ****wit.
> > >
> > Mahindra>
> >
> >
>
> Not unless you are one yourself!
>
> What has really amazed me is the number of "experts" that frequent these
> newsgroups. All the posters have, or so it would seem by their in depth
> knowledge on how "crap" Mahindras are, been past owners. It would appear
> that comparisons between what is effectively a 1950's designed car with a
> 1970's designed engine, are being made with the latest eurocrap or
Japanese
> 4x4's. which baulk at the slightest sign of a puddle. If comparisons are
> being made with a LR series or a SJ, well I've owned a 1972 SIII diesel
and
> a 1984 SJ, which were both slow, noisy, uncomfortable, wandered all over
the
> road, brakes - eventually and has all the creature comforts of a cow shed.
> Off road, they were great, but there again, a Mahindra is certainly their
> equal - we are talking bog standard here with MT tyres.
>
> Do Landies and SJs get slated? Well not very often. They each have their
> place and their followers. Lighten up people. To each their own. If you
> don't like Mahindras then fine, but don't slag something off that you have
> no personal experience of.
>
> Mahindraman
>
>
