Ideally an engine is designed to run a coolant temp of approximately 102-105 deg C. This helps atomisation of fuel and stops fuel puddling on cylinder walls. The coolant also removes heat from the oil because oils need to work within temp limits.
So really to get the best economy and power its probably best to try and stick to about 102 dec C.
I am new to Freelanders so someone might have come up with this before.
I used to have a Reliant Scimitar ( it did have 4 wheels) it was fibreglass and had a ford essex 3.0 litre engine. As the fibreglass held in the heat they sometimes suffer from over heating. People found that by drilling a 3mm hole in the inner edge of the rim of the thermostat it would always allow some coolant flow round the engine. It did make warm up a little slower but it would also stop thermal shocks.
Might be worth a try? I cant think of any reason that this might cause a problem but you guys are the Freelander experts.
Good point about the atomisation of the fuel... although flashpoint of petrol has such a vast range even under pressure. Most of the aerosolisation of the fuel is from the pressure of your fuel pump and injector opening.
I have heard others on MG-Rover.org mentioning 'squish points' on the valve inlets..... How relative is this?? I am not sure??, dont think its been quantified or verified?
Was speaking to a mate last night about the good old days. Another mates uncle (who has long since past away) had a 3.0l Scimitar, he raced the traffic cops in their 2.8i Capri back in the days before speed cameras.
When stopped he was asked what he was up to... to which he told the cop he wanted to see which car was faster, the 2.8 was left for dust.. He he!!
Thats what I am trying to achieve. some sort of small bypass. in your experience with the hole on thermostat, do you think it will lowered the operating temp? by how much approximately?
Dearot - I drilled the stat ring as you probably noticed on other threads,6 holes at 4mm is an extra 75.36 mm2 of surface area. On a hot blazing day coming out of work, sitting in traffic the temperature takes a little longer to rise but only goes to about a third of the temp gauge. Before I drilled the stat the gauge was always at just under half way.
I dont have any thermocouples to probe the coolant system with so dont know what the temp of the coolant is in real terms(oC).
However, as soon as I get out of town and hit 50mph on a B road the temp on the gauge drops. On cold mornings when driving at 50mph it can go from third of the temp gauge to the two whites lines on the base of the gauge

. So efficiency of rad, coolant system is dependent on ambient air temperature and air flow over the rad and engine etc.
Only drill one or two 4mm holes in the stat ring. I have another spare stat ring to mess about with, going to drill either side of the two supports, hoping this will channel the cooler water around the stat and not through it.
The holes dont increase flow rate (velocity) so to speak but they increase 'throughput' of the volume of coolant. Does that make sense? Pump speed has not changed but volume has.
I have some links (courtesy of MHM, will supply them if you need) about guys modding the coolant system on the MGF and Lotus Elise, I dont subscribe to the gradual/ambient temp variation on the engine causing hgf, more so the initial opening of the stat from cold (initial shock). The MGF cup cars never had a stat fitted and they didnt suffer from hgf until very high mileage. The only reason they failed is because the red elastomeric compound on the OE gasket is crap!!
So if the MGF cup cars had the stat removed, temp fluctuations must have been over a wide range. So howcome they never had hgf until old age?
Have even read that one tech guru reckons that the cooling efficiency of the Rad in the MGF is far greater than what is required of the k-series engine.

The Rad in the freelander is twice the size of that in the MGF so does that make it even more OTT????