scorpio composed the following;:
>> I was trying more to follow the logic of a 2cv "belching out more
>> **** than a fleet of Landys"...
>>
>> Yet to see any Landy manage 40mpg...
>
>
> The point is it does'nt matter how much you do to the gallon it is the
> harmful crap you spew out and Most Landy are far more environmentally
> cleaner than a 2CV
Sheeit, isn't this _JUST_ what the feckin' tree huggers want ?
4x4 owners arguing amongst themselves rather than realising we're _ALL_
tarred with the same brush anyway, whatever marque we drive. They don't
understand the difference between a 4x4 2CV and a Landrover anyway, if
it has 4x4 transmission (and yes, there _are_ 4x4 2CV's about) it's a
'gas-guzzler' and environmentally poor, in their eyes.
Personally I couldn't give a **** if someone drives a Landy, a 2CV a
Jeep a Suzuki or whatever,[1] so long as they're doing it off-road and
enjoying it, and the more people that do go legally off-road, the more
power we all have to lobby for our pastime where it truly counts, in the
ballot box, at whatever level.
[1] I _do_ dislike Mahindras though ..
--
Paul ...
http://www.4x4prejudice.org/index.php
(8(!) Homer Rules ...

"A tosser is a tosser, no matter what mode of transport they're using."