Dgethin came up with the following;:
> I have a Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.0TD, I would like to know what is the most
> economical speed to get the most MPG.
> Many Thanks
Get a bicycle.
Seriously, it depends a lot on state of tune of the
engine/gearbox/tyres/road conditions etc. IME (not with a SGV) the most
economical speed is only found empirically, but so much depends upon what
you're doing, how the car is and so many other factors no-one could say,
correctly.
eg, go 50mph with a 10 mph tail wind and you'd probably get better mpg than
30 mph with a 10mph head wind ...
Paul - xxx wrote:
> Dgethin came up with the following;:
>> I have a Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.0TD, I would like to know what is the
>> most economical speed to get the most MPG.
>> Many Thanks
>
> Get a bicycle.
>
> Seriously, it depends a lot on state of tune of the
> engine/gearbox/tyres/road conditions etc. IME (not with a SGV) the
> most economical speed is only found empirically, but so much depends
> upon what you're doing, how the car is and so many other factors
> no-one could say, correctly.
>
> eg, go 50mph with a 10 mph tail wind and you'd probably get better
> mpg than 30 mph with a 10mph head wind ...
On a flat surface with no particularly adverse variables, 55mph in top gear
is usually tuned to give optimum economy.
"Huw" <hedydd[nospam]@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:46473iF99ai1U1@individual.net...
> Paul - xxx wrote:
>> Dgethin came up with the following;:
>>> I have a Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.0TD, I would like to know what is the
>>> most economical speed to get the most MPG.
>>> Many Thanks
>>
>> Get a bicycle.
>>
>> Seriously, it depends a lot on state of tune of the
>> engine/gearbox/tyres/road conditions etc. IME (not with a SGV) the
>> most economical speed is only found empirically, but so much depends
>> upon what you're doing, how the car is and so many other factors
>> no-one could say, correctly.
>>
>> eg, go 50mph with a 10 mph tail wind and you'd probably get better
>> mpg than 30 mph with a 10mph head wind ...
>
> On a flat surface with no particularly adverse variables, 55mph in top
> gear is usually tuned to give optimum economy.
>
> Huw
unless your car is a moped and does 35mph, this theory may be different.
: 0 )
In message <463a61F966crU1@individual.net>, Paul - xxx
<notcheckedever@hotmail.com> writes
>Dgethin came up with the following;:
>> I have a Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.0TD, I would like to know what is the most
>> economical speed to get the most MPG.
>> Many Thanks
>
>Get a bicycle.
>
>Seriously, it depends a lot on state of tune of the
>engine/gearbox/tyres/road conditions etc. IME (not with a SGV) the
>most economical speed is only found empirically, but so much depends
>upon what you're doing, how the car is and so many other factors no-one
>could say, correctly.
>
>eg, go 50mph with a 10 mph tail wind and you'd probably get better mpg
>than 30 mph with a 10mph head wind ...
>
Zero with the engine switched off?
--
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting
In message <1c8Lf.69876$0N1.5050@newsfe5-win.ntli.net>, Doner Kebab
<r.bateman@virgin.net> writes
>
>"Huw" <hedydd[nospam]@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:46473iF99ai1U1@individual.net...
>> Paul - xxx wrote:
>>> Dgethin came up with the following;:
>>>> I have a Suzuki Grand Vitara 2.0TD, I would like to know what is the
>>>> most economical speed to get the most MPG.
>>>> Many Thanks
>>>
>>> Get a bicycle.
>>>
>>> Seriously, it depends a lot on state of tune of the
>>> engine/gearbox/tyres/road conditions etc. IME (not with a SGV) the
>>> most economical speed is only found empirically, but so much depends
>>> upon what you're doing, how the car is and so many other factors
>>> no-one could say, correctly.
>>>
>>> eg, go 50mph with a 10 mph tail wind and you'd probably get better
>>> mpg than 30 mph with a 10mph head wind ...
>>
>> On a flat surface with no particularly adverse variables, 55mph in top
>> gear is usually tuned to give optimum economy.
>>
>> Huw
> unless your car is a moped and does 35mph, this theory may be different.
>: 0 )
>
>
By definition, a car is not a moped.
--
hugh
Reply to address is valid at the time of posting