i agreeto an extent with this too... but...
good quality traction control when used in a high end performance car works cos it adjusts power distribution and braking to all 4 wheels independantly - so it does, when properly implimented, give 'more traction' or rather it allows the traction to be used to its full.
The police when they used to bother with car accidents used to calculate the maximum speed of a corner, using the corners radius, shape, camber, etc.
I dnt understand how they can - if you take a LR around a corner at say 40, and just make it round, you would be able to do the same corner in a high performanace sports car at a much higher speed, and still make it round. How can you say 'yes that corner is doable at 50, and nothing more?'
And surely if discs are given the same maintainence of drums, they are just as good, if not better? Probably not on hills mind, but for stopping power and reliability?
In my limited experience i have heard of one drum throwing a shoe and one disc throwing a shoe. Pray enlighten me!
good quality traction control when used in a high end performance car works cos it adjusts power distribution and braking to all 4 wheels independantly - so it does, when properly implimented, give 'more traction' or rather it allows the traction to be used to its full.
The police when they used to bother with car accidents used to calculate the maximum speed of a corner, using the corners radius, shape, camber, etc.
I dnt understand how they can - if you take a LR around a corner at say 40, and just make it round, you would be able to do the same corner in a high performanace sports car at a much higher speed, and still make it round. How can you say 'yes that corner is doable at 50, and nothing more?'
And surely if discs are given the same maintainence of drums, they are just as good, if not better? Probably not on hills mind, but for stopping power and reliability?
In my limited experience i have heard of one drum throwing a shoe and one disc throwing a shoe. Pray enlighten me!