Sounds like you know more than they do.
Yes, those two chips are the ones. That's why the Nanocom has to access one at a time with 2 screens. They do indeed contains the maps etc. The chips are 1 write only as far as i am aware.
The annoying thing for me was that before the car became immobilised I used to get a regular 25mpg (Manual 2.5 Turbo Diesel P38) even with driving it hardish, and it was relatively quick'ish.. I often thought about chipping it, as a friend had one done by DMS and it ended up being very rapid and he mentioned got 25mpg (Auto 2.5 Turbo Diesel P38) so I thought I would probably get more with it being an manual... When I got the ECU and BECM back from the chap in Brighton who fixed the immobiliser issue, it was noticeably slower and I was lucky to get 17mpg! So I think it may have already have been remapped previously and the chap may have written new standard chips out for it.. Who knows, but I wish I had read the chips before it went off so I could look at the differences now..
The large chips are probably one time UV erasable if you take them out and in a eprom writer they can be written once and used, but to erase or alter them you need to us a UV Eraser first to blank them, something like a 27C64, 27C128 or 27C256.
The smaller 8 pin EEPROM is probably a serial eeprom, used by Microchip keyloc or megamos security systems which are on most cars, and can be electrically erased and re-written either via the ECU or with a slightly higher end EPROM/EEPROM writer, on most ECU's these are where the immobiliser codes and other security lives, and to be honest, if you are used to it, the encryption is pretty easy to hack on Keyloc and Megamos which are the two most popular examples used by everyone from Clifford, Toad, BMW, VW, Audi, Porsche, Bentley, Ford, Jaguar, Alfa, Fiat etc etc..
I would like to add though, I have a P38 2.5 TD Range Rover, but I am a complete amateur with them, my area of knowledge is with Porsche Ecu's with a casual interest in other vehicles.