On another forum I saw the following question and reply.
It might be an old and much-discussed question, but whatÂ’s your opinion? Do you agree? ARE ALL LANDROVERS THOUGHT TO BE UNRELIABLE, OR IS IT PARTICULAR MODELS. If so, which ones? And does it apply to recently manufactured Landrovers?
I want a vehicle for driving through Africa. I love the Land Rover Defender and Discovery, but all the advice seems to point toward a Toyota. Why?
The overall reason why people suggest a Toyota is reliability. The overall reason why not to take a Land Rover product is reliability. It's that simple. If you take a Land Rover (I have owned three spanning 18 years), you have an 99% chance of minor trouble, 60% chance of major but repairable trouble and a 25% chance of major trouble where the repair is lengthy and expensive and difficult-to-get spares are needed.
With a Toyota (assuming it's not an old clap-trap) the probability is a 50% chance of minor trouble, 10% chance of major but repairable trouble and a 1% chance of major, major trouble
It might be an old and much-discussed question, but whatÂ’s your opinion? Do you agree? ARE ALL LANDROVERS THOUGHT TO BE UNRELIABLE, OR IS IT PARTICULAR MODELS. If so, which ones? And does it apply to recently manufactured Landrovers?
I want a vehicle for driving through Africa. I love the Land Rover Defender and Discovery, but all the advice seems to point toward a Toyota. Why?
The overall reason why people suggest a Toyota is reliability. The overall reason why not to take a Land Rover product is reliability. It's that simple. If you take a Land Rover (I have owned three spanning 18 years), you have an 99% chance of minor trouble, 60% chance of major but repairable trouble and a 25% chance of major trouble where the repair is lengthy and expensive and difficult-to-get spares are needed.
With a Toyota (assuming it's not an old clap-trap) the probability is a 50% chance of minor trouble, 10% chance of major but repairable trouble and a 1% chance of major, major trouble