A

Awwwkrap

Guest

• May 18, 2005

• #1

Is there anything commonly wrong with the 2001,2002 Lincoln Ls? Cause I may
be considering one.

 

P

Peter D. Hipson

Guest

• May 19, 2005

• #2

On Wed, 18 May 2005 15:17:00 -0400, "Awwwkrap" <capt_liu@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Is there anything commonly wrong with the 2001,2002 Lincoln Ls? Cause I may
>be considering one.


I doubt the four wheel drive is up to serious off-roading, but you
could be the first to try it... Let us know.

 

L

Lon

Guest

• May 21, 2005

• #3

Awwwkrap proclaimed:

> Is there anything commonly wrong with the 2001,2002 Lincoln Ls? Cause I may
> be considering one.
>
Well, off the top of my head, I don't think you can get one with
4-wheel drive. It does have a cousin with the same chassis that
can be had thusly, but the Jag isn't really considered an off road
vehicle--unless you count going into a high speed turn overcooked and
underskilled.

 

M

Marc Sebens

Guest

• May 27, 2005

• #4

Pretty much the point...since this is a 4x4 newsgroup


"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:UZWdnQti_YIE0hLfRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
> Awwwkrap proclaimed:
>
>> Is there anything commonly wrong with the 2001,2002 Lincoln Ls? Cause I
>> may
>> be considering one.
> Well, off the top of my head, I don't think you can get one with
> 4-wheel drive. It does have a cousin with the same chassis that
> can be had thusly, but the Jag isn't really considered an off road
> vehicle--unless you count going into a high speed turn overcooked and
> underskilled.