A bit of armchair piffle.....:blabla:
The problem as I see it is that Series Land Rovers were designed in a different age, to perform functions we rarely use them for now.
At the time, petrol was cheap enough to not be a major factor in the running of them for these jobs (who cared if it used a few gallons of fuel a week if it meant keeping your sheep alive, the dam got built or you kept the peace in whatever far-flung part of the world you were...)
Nothing comes for free, and the price of a heavy, robust vehicle is high fuel consumption, in fact looking at it in our modern fuel-efficient world the idea of a 2 ton vehicle powered by a 2 1/4 litre petrol engine seems faintly laughable.
Having said that, they are actually quite well balanced power to weight in the sticky stuff (there's no point in simply adding horsepower to dig yourself a deeper hole). Horses for courses.
When looking at major outlays in cash for fuel saving mechanicals, like overdrives, high ratio transfer boxes etc etc, I really do think it pays to sit down and work out how long it will take to recoup the money. The answers can sometimes be surprising.
Also, how effective would these things be if you only use the truck for short distances? Believe me, I've been there with this one and whilst there are undeniably savings to be made in the long term, you do come up against the final reality that there is a point where it ain't going to get any cheaper. As a previous post said: If you want it really efficient, don't turn it on.
