Odd that, the construction and use regs require the battery to be secure so you would think it would be in the MOT![]()
The C and U regs said you had to have a Cat from 1993. But the MOT did not check for one til now. Mot is getting a bit stupid now. Steering, brakes and suspension yes. But all these other silly regs are getting out of hand. Think it's jobs for the boys, regulation for regulation sake, these days.
Always been nervous about unsecured batteries. A company I used to work for had a mini van, the battery was behind the drivers seat under the floor. Under heavy braking one day it slid forward and a metal bar went with it, dropped onto the terminals and the whole lot exploded covering the driver in acid and molten metal. He was not a pretty sight when he came out of hospitalThese days he would have been in line for a big wad of damages on no win no fee
![]()
Yes Keith battery should be secure. Was thinking more of the sweeping Euro nonsense they are trying to bring in. Brakes suspension and steering i will live with but no vehicle should ever be failed for having a number plate bulb blown. Or as my sons father in law did in Spain, have his car failed because the side steps and rear window tints were not origonal equipement. Having to remove the tints and have his steps signed off by the main dealer at a cost. That is a bloody nonsense.