Time For A National Greenlaning Initiative?

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

BOOMER

Bloke from Dorset
Posts
6,051
Location
All Over Dorset and beyond.
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]Dear all. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]There has been quite a lot of 'discussion' regarding greenlaning in the press, on social media or 4x4 forums and groups: A lot of people love mud, modifying their vehicles and sharing it for all to see. I would now like to share my very grave thoughts with you all about the future of greenlaning in the UK and ultimately offer an idea to a possible solution, I would appreciate you giving up five minutes of your time to read this as it affects each and every one of us who enjoy the countryside in our 4x4s.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]I rarely (if ever) see people looking to the future of our hobby, nearly everyone is living for the day and failing to look ahead and appreciate the fact that there is a very real danger that the hobby we all share and enjoy is likely to be the subject of government legislation that (if passed) effectively puts new laws into place that ban us from the countryside forever. Many of us are unaware of this as it is being very quietly slipped through the back door, some of us are aware yet choose to ignore it and bury their heads in the sand, or like me, are acutely aware of this proposed legislation and are worried about it.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]You can read more about this here: [/FONT][FONT=Arial,sans-serif]http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201314/jtselect/jtdraftdereg/101/10107.htm[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]Section 147 onwards applies to all of us, this is what we should be reading, digesting and collectively formulating a proactive plan to thwart this threat.....and I think we need to change our ways and the public perception of our hobby before it is too late, we need to offer something positive to those who oppose our legitimate hobby in order to persuade them to change their minds.[/FONT]
There is an exceptionally powerful movement behind all this, including royalty, MPs, prominent landowners and gentry, GLEAM http://www.gleam-uk.org/ and the inevitable Ramblers Association. If you look at some of the some of the photographs on the GLEAM site they go out of their way to show greenlaners in a negative light but I suspect that someone has been very economical with the truth and very selective about which photographs to use in their publicity, yet sadly there is a hardcore amongst us who do not care about the damage they inflict on the countryside and are inevitably tarring all the responsible greenlaners with the same brush.

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]The thing is, greenlanes (whether in the form of a BOAT or a UCR) are a shared user public route, they are not just for the sole use of 4x4s, as trail riders, horseriders, cyclists and walkers use them too - the state of some of these routes are nothing short of shameful and often we are the culprits for making them that way.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]Adopt an apathetic attitude towards this at your peril, if we wish to continue enjoying our hobby we have to collectively start to make some radical changes in our approach to it, the time has come to change our ways, to work together, to banish our image as the pariahs of the countryside and how the public perceive us....there are lots of things that we need to start doing in order for us to continue enjoying our hobby well into the future.

[/FONT]Now we know the ramblers very successfully got their 'Right To Roam' but we won't be so lucky to obtain anything like that by using a militant approach as they did. I've never looked at greenlaning as a god given right, it is a privilege to do what we do and if that privilege is abused it can be taken away. So perhaps it is time for us to lead the way and put back some of what we have all taken in a positive, rather than negative way?
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]You don't see the ramblers doing that but look how far their persistence is getting them, especially taking into account how the actions of the less responsible 4x4 owners have played right into their hands. If the lanes are closed because we buried our heads in the sand we can no longer legally enjoy our hobby, if we choose to carry on we are greenlaning illegally, we risk section 59 and our vehicles condemned to the crusher, considering that a lot of us own vehicles costing many thousands of pounds the crusher is to be rather avoided!

We have to change our public image, have a new code of conduct expanding on the existing GLASS code of conduct to a much higher level, be more conscientious in our use of lanes and how we impact on them, remember that we share them with other users on foot/horseback. It is time for the responsible majority of greenlaners amongst us to start reporting or educating those who are going to get us banned that UCRs and BOATs are not solely for mud plugging, we need to self police and report those who are spoiling it for the rest of us and other users. Maybe showing your local MP the responsible and conscientious side to our hobby would be advantageous to prove a new approach to greenlaning is the right thing to do?[/FONT]

Many of us remember the NERC Act in 2006 where we lost many driveable rights of way forever. They were downgraded to Restricted Byways, bridleways and footpaths due to there being an acute lack of formal user evidence to support any claim that it was a right of way in regular public use. Admittedly it was a farce and was poorly executed by the government but in 2026 it is going to happen again.....unless everyone starts making records of the lanes they use and taking photographic evidence to prove that the lane has been used by a motorised vehicle and ideally has been undamaged by that use - if we cannot prove the lanes are being used and used responsibly we're going to lose them, any evidence we gather in the future will need to be submitted to GLASS, LARA, local 4x4 club or County Council Rights Of Way Department. At Dorset Land Rover Club we already have a Greenlane Reporting System in place and the county council is steadily receiving a flow of user evidence in readiness for 2026.

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]Many areas are subject to overuse because of the reduction of available lanes after NERC 2006, that is a valid point, but I feel that it could also be attributed to the side effect of irresponsible people who go out with the sole intention of looking for mud and have no respect for the countryside or other rights of way users
BUT, even if the pre - NERC greenlane network still existed there would still be areas[/FONT][FONT=Arial,sans-serif] where the idiots congregate solely to get stuck or to satisfy their craving for mud, true greenlaning isn't about that but it is the negative image that always stays in peoples minds. You wouldn't drive down a tarmac road with a JCB and deliberately destroy the surface, that's illegal; deliberately driving a greenlane with the intention of ripping it up with your 4x4 is no different, it's a public right of way, therefore it is just as illegal.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]There's also a knock on economic effect if our hobby gets banned. From greenlaners to triallers to clubs to accessory manufacturers to LRO/LRM to the used car market, this will affect us all in some way. Maybe there will be new interest in trialling from the banned greenlaners that wish to broaden their horizons.....or will they have already tried to sell their 4x4s in disgust and moved on to something else? There will be reduced income for aftermarket parts, servicing agents and accessory manufacturers - who needs big tyres, lift kits and winch bumpers any more? Will the bottom will fall out of the market for 4x4s, rendering many of our vehicles effectively worthless? What about all the other small businesses such as rural garages, shops and guest houses? The long term impact of a ban seems endless....

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]I am a member of various 4x4 groups across internet forums and social media, I am shocked by the amount of off-piste activity by the ignorant minority that is publicly exhibited on the internet - I am also pleased to see that the backlash towards these people is also on the increase and I actively encourage naming and shaming these morons. I don't want this deregulation bill to become law, many others like me don't want this to happen and this is resulting in a ever increasing minority who are tirelessly working away behind the scenes who are alarmed at the general disinterest and apathy towards this subject that is being shown right across the spectrum of the 4x4 fraternity. [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]T[/FONT][FONT=Arial,sans-serif]he whole image of greenlaning has to change in order to change the perception of greenlaning by those who oppose it, it's all very well objecting to further lane closures or total closure, but unless each and every one of us get our house in order and prove that we can collectively be responsible and respect the UK greenlane network then on what grounds can we expect all those who oppose us to listen and give us the opportunity to turn things around?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]
We have to offer them something positve, a proactive and radical approach to appease them and this is my idea...[/FONT]


[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]What I foresee happening is an actual increasein the amount of illegal or irresponsible greenlaning to the point where in the public eye it becomes an even more antisocial hobby than they think it already is. The image of greenlaning has to change from something which is perceived as clandestine and unacceptable into a perception of a legitimate, responsible hobby that doesn't destroy but also contributes to the well being of the countryside. [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]This will require full cooperation from all of us individually, 4x4 groups/clubs and the various county councils in order to make a new pilot schemework, a licensed greenlaning scheme that will apply to all motorised users of the greenlane network across the UK.[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]Membership of a recognised group will be a condition of the scheme and will be used to self regulate our hobby with the assistance of legislation at local government level, without resorting to the draconian parliamentary deregulation bill - this is our last chance to offer something constructive and to prove that we can do it right.
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]This pilot scheme will enable only those who are registered on the county council database and a member of a recognised body to legitimately use the unsurfaced right of way network within the county. To register you must prove that your vehicle is taxed/insured/MOT'd, that you possess OS mapping for the area and know how to use it, that you have joined a recognised body and have attained a Greenlaning Competency Certificate ( I'll explain the GCC later) - ONLY then will you be deemed as a legitimate greenlaner within that county, only then will you be issued with a unique identification disc and number and only then will you have access to the live database of the county's lane network with clearly set guidelines. Exemptions will be given to landowners and other essential users such as gamekeepers but they will still have to register their vehicles.

I'd like to see a Lane Warden system set up where the legal and responsible laners can 'police' the lanes whilst enjoying their hobby, maybe an ANPR system could be utilised. This takes the Greenlane Reporting system mentioned earlier to a far higher level whereby we can send any pictorial evidence of off piste activity (and the perpetrators if they're still there) to the relevant authorities. This could also be used to monitor lane condition and to temporarily close lanes as and when necessary (a new, flexible TRO system), these details will be kept on a live database maintained by the council rights of way department so licenced greenlaners can log on and see where they can and cannot go with no excuses BEFORE they go out.

Ultimately this could discourage people coming from other areas, not caring about whether the ground conditions are suitable or not and then going home having trashed the lanes - the cowboy element cannot join up without first having been screened through the Greenlaning Competency Certificate and those that continue to illegally greenlane will be easier to spot if they are not registered and displaying the correct disc and unique number - yes it's a somewhat unorthodox idea but there is a definite problem that needs stamping out and that whilst self regulation works amongst the more responsible laners it doesn't work for the other idiots for whom legislation and enforcement is the only option - ultimately 'Responsible Rural Recreation' will become a term of phrase that will not only apply to every one of us who registers to the scheme but will apply to the entire greenlane network nationwide.

[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]The Greenlaning Competency Certificate is something that I strongly feel needs to be set up so we can use it as another measure to prove to the powers that be that we are adopting a proactive approach with a responsible solution to what many regard as a problem hobby. For most of us, gaining the certificate would be a walk in the park, but there has been a big rise in the number of active greenlaners within the country, it's an easy hobby to get into as just a few hundred pounds will buy you something four wheel drive with an MOT. Sadly many people spend huge sums of money modifying their vehicles rather than spend a few pounds on an OS map and learn how to read it. I have witnessed several people who need some tactful tuition to groom their skill levels to that of a competent greenlaner. It's something I already do with club members and as a privateer, I take these people out and get them to study maps and navigate themselves in a small group, I want to pass on to them my knowledge and for them to gain the confidence and skill levels to see and do what an experienced person can, rather than just turn the key and drive off and trespass. Obtaining a Greenlaning Competency Certificate would ensure that the ignorant have to become aware of their responsibilities and that the right way is the only way...[/FONT]

It will obviously cost money to fund this scheme, it will cost money to gain a certificate but seeming as we all spend huge sums on our vehicles I really cant see how a bit extra to legitimise our hobby will impact on the majority of us. I wonder if GLASS and TRF would be better off putting money into the pot for something like this rather than putting vast sums of money into various contentious greenlane legal cases? After all, if we're all doing it right there won't be a case to answer will there?
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif]I know that it's more red tape, but remember that those who shoot require a firearms certificate, a 4x4 used inappropriately in a sensitive area could also be considered a bit of a 'loaded gun', this scheme is a small trade off to continue what some of us enjoy doing, they wish to legislate us out, so why don't we legislate ourselves IN...

Thank you for taking the time to read this, please at least consider the idea before you ridicule it, I want to provoke thought and discussion on the subject by thinking outside the box - like it or not this affects all of us, we need to plan for the future before it's too late. As you can tell, I am somebody who is rather passionate about greenlanes, greenlaning and the countryside in general, I am an advocate of ‘Responsible, Rural Recreation’ and will do everything I can to promote greenlaning in a more positive way.

Kind regards,[/FONT]
[/FONT]

[FONT=Arial,sans-serif][FONT=Arial,sans-serif]Rob Elliott.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif][FONT=Arial,sans-serif]Greenlanes Officer.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial,sans-serif][FONT=Arial,sans-serif]Dorset Land Rover Club.[/FONT][/FONT]
 
An interesting proposition ;)

Hard to disagree with any of that. :)

Very interesting, sounds like a plan

GCC sounds like a positive step to me, I'm in..

sounds like a good idea

I know it's a bit radical but I'm getting fed up with the general apathetic attitude to what is a very real threat, I'm not scared to post my thoughts....:rolleyes:
 
I'm certainly interested but your tone concerns me slightly.

Lots of us are concerned and far from apathetic and actively do a lot of what you are proposing.

Maybe I'm being over sensitive but general criticism of laners and established groups such as GLASS seems an odd starting point.

I also don't quite understand the singling out of folk who travel to a different area to enjoy lanes. In my experience these people are more likely to have at least done research on legality and have a greater interest in having an unbroken vehicle to get home in. I suspect lads buying a 4x4 for a few hundred notes to rag around the local lanes cause far more damage.

My feeling is we need to fight for our rights nationally rather than doing separate deals to be allowed to use lanes with local authorities. That could effectively outlaw lanes for everyone on the say so of a small group of people.

I very much support a simple system of reporting misuse and from what I see there is increasingly less criticism and stigma directed at those prepared to do so.
 
I also don't quite understand the singling out of folk who travel to a different area to enjoy lanes. In my experience these people are more likely to have at least done research on legality and have a greater interest in having an unbroken vehicle to get home in. I suspect lads buying a 4x4 for a few hundred notes to rag around the local lanes cause far more damage.

I think that's definitely the case around here in Cambridgeshire & Cambs / Suffolk / Norfolk boarders....many see it as a cheap day (or in many cases night) out......

And I agree if there is little local knowledge because you're from outside the area you're much more likely to contact local area reps / RoW officer at council and / or do the research yourself.....
 
I'm certainly interested but your tone concerns me slightly.

Lots of us are concerned and far from apathetic and actively do a lot of what you are proposing.

Maybe I'm being over sensitive but general criticism of laners and established groups such as GLASS seems an odd starting point.

I also don't quite understand the singling out of folk who travel to a different area to enjoy lanes. In my experience these people are more likely to have at least done research on legality and have a greater interest in having an unbroken vehicle to get home in. I suspect lads buying a 4x4 for a few hundred notes to rag around the local lanes cause far more damage.

My feeling is we need to fight for our rights nationally rather than doing separate deals to be allowed to use lanes with local authorities. That could effectively outlaw lanes for everyone on the say so of a small group of people.

I very much support a simple system of reporting misuse and from what I see there is increasingly less criticism and stigma directed at those prepared to do so.

My tone is of concern? The tone of many who are either ignorant or so damned arrogant that they can't see or appreciate the damage that they have caused through irresponsible greenlaning in certain areas that are much more susceptible to damage due to ground or weather conditions at the time is, I think, of much more concern than my tone.

Just because somebody is driving a legal byway/UCR doesn't mean that they have the god given right to go ploughing through regardless when the ground conditions are poor does it?

It's all about being responsible, having a conscience and above all being accountable for your actions rather than just driving off to wherever, getting muddy/stuck and then heading for home having left a huge mess behind.

Not everyone is like this, I know that, but there is an ever growing number among us who literally do not give a toss what they do, where they go and what they leave behind....and they don't all drive beat up 800 quid Discoveries.

You are quite correct that many people do conduct some research about the areas they intend to visit if going far away from home (there are organised LZ trips of the past that are proof of this) but that didn't stop the hordes from descending onto SPTA from all over the country last winter did it?

When you consider that there was a public appeal by SPTA to stay away early last year due to the unprecedented levels of groundwater, flooding in villages and the damage being caused to some byways where they were being used regardless in inappropriate ground conditions is it any wonder that a popular chunk of SPTA is now TRO'd for six months over winter 2014/15?

Did people do their research then? And now people have the cheek to moan about it! Why else am I banging on about getting our house in order?

By showing self respect, self restraint, respect for the rights of way and its other users, having a conscientious attitude and responsible approach we just might gain some respect from those who hate us, like it or not this does apply to all of us.....

I am well aware that what I've said may be far from a perfect answer, but at least I'm trying to do something about it, what are YOU doing about it?
 
How do peeps become "competent" If they're not allowed on a greenlane until they can prove their competence??

For this to happen the legal status of greenlanes will have to change. at the mo they are, Public highways, to prevent or make it illegal for members of the public to drive them would require them to have a whole new definition.

A good idea in theory but in practise completely unworkable.
 
How do peeps become "competent" If they're not allowed on a greenlane until they can prove their competence??

For this to happen the legal status of greenlanes will have to change. at the mo they are, Public highways, to prevent or make it illegal for members of the public to drive them would require them to have a whole new definition.

A good idea in theory but in practise completely unworkable.

Good point and I shall explain...

There are many truck drivers including myself that were horrified at the prospect of having to pass a DCPC (Driver Certificate of Professional Competence) despite many of us knowing how to do our jobs perfectly well.

Without it, we would lose our right to work as a professional driver despite retaining a vocational licence - any driver stopped at a roadside check without one is off the road with immediate effect, insurance companies will not provide cover without evidence that the driver has DCPC qualification and companies are obliged to check that their drivers are qualified as a condition of retaining their goods vehicle operators licence.

If this system can be put into place then I do not see why a similar system can't be implemented (albeit on a much smaller scale) with a GCPC qualification.

There will be a degree of classroom training which includes map reading and being able to identify the different rights of way, along with an approved form of 'best practice' on their use, before being taken out onto the greenlane network as a group to be assessed and hopefully gaining the qualification.

Insurance companies can easily cancel any form of off-road cover until the GCPC is gained, just like they could with a heavy goods driver. It also means that there is no excuse for off piste play or ripping up the byways as you are now technically qualified - a series of hefty on the spot fines could prove as much a deterrent to rogue off-roaders as it has proved with rogue drivers.

Like the DCPC, the GCPC could have a two year 'grace' period in which to give sufficient time for everyone who wishes to carry on greenlaning an opportunity to gain the relevant certification.

Now tell me it's unworkable...
 
Good point and I shall explain...

There are many truck drivers including myself that were horrified at the prospect of having to pass a DCPC (Driver Certificate of Professional Competence) despite many of us knowing how to do our jobs perfectly well.

It also means that there is no excuse for off piste play or ripping up the byways as you are now technically qualified - a series of hefty on the spot fines could prove as much a deterrent to rogue off-roaders as it has proved with rogue drivers.
.

Agree about the DCPC, all the cattle hauliers were up in arms about it, but now they have done it, they think it is a good thing! :)

I would certainly be in favour of hefty fines for abuse, and hope that some of them, and any revenues raised by a competency certificate, could be channelled in some way to repair and clearance. It seems to me that if the 4x4 community was seen by other byway users to be helping all classes of user there would be less opposition to laning.
 
My tone is of concern? The tone of many who are either ignorant or so damned arrogant that they can't see or appreciate the damage that they have caused through irresponsible greenlaning in certain areas that are much more susceptible to damage due to ground or weather conditions at the time is, I think, of much more concern than my tone.

Just because somebody is driving a legal byway/UCR doesn't mean that they have the god given right to go ploughing through regardless when the ground conditions are poor does it?

It's all about being responsible, having a conscience and above all being accountable for your actions rather than just driving off to wherever, getting muddy/stuck and then heading for home having left a huge mess behind.

Not everyone is like this, I know that, but there is an ever growing number among us who literally do not give a toss what they do, where they go and what they leave behind....and they don't all drive beat up 800 quid Discoveries.

You are quite correct that many people do conduct some research about the areas they intend to visit if going far away from home (there are organised LZ trips of the past that are proof of this) but that didn't stop the hordes from descending onto SPTA from all over the country last winter did it?

When you consider that there was a public appeal by SPTA to stay away early last year due to the unprecedented levels of groundwater, flooding in villages and the damage being caused to some byways where they were being used regardless in inappropriate ground conditions is it any wonder that a popular chunk of SPTA is now TRO'd for six months over winter 2014/15?

Did people do their research then? And now people have the cheek to moan about it! Why else am I banging on about getting our house in order?

By showing self respect, self restraint, respect for the rights of way and its other users, having a conscientious attitude and responsible approach we just might gain some respect from those who hate us, like it or not this does apply to all of us.....

I am well aware that what I've said may be far from a perfect answer, but at least I'm trying to do something about it, what are YOU doing about it?

You kind of illustrating my point. You know me, you know I advocate and when necessary enforce responsible lining but you're ranting at me :confused:

Your starting point seems to be laners are ****e, mud flinging prats that must be forced into line.

That's my concern.

We all know they're out there but we also know most are not like that and many are passionate about lane preservation as well as the right to use them.
 
You kind of illustrating my point. You know me, you know I advocate and when necessary enforce responsible lining but you're ranting at me :confused:

Your starting point seems to be laners are ****e, mud flinging prats that must be forced into line.

That's my concern.

We all know they're out there but we also know most are not like that and many are passionate about lane preservation as well as the right to use them.

You know me BB, I don't mince my words or beat about the bush, I only seem like I'm ranting because I'm not a fellow sandal wearing pacifist :p:D

As you say, not all greenlaners 'are ****e, mud flinging prats that must be forced into line', I never said that per se, but I think the crux of the matter is that we're pretty much reading from the same page in sharing similar views on the matter, as well as our own.
 
You kind of illustrating my point. You know me, you know I advocate and when necessary enforce responsible lining but you're ranting at me :confused:

Your starting point seems to be laners are ****e, mud flinging prats that must be forced into line.

That's my concern.

We all know they're out there but we also know most are not like that and many are passionate about lane preservation as well as the right to use them.

I agree, and I an sure all your laning activities are entirely responsible, as I hope are mine. :)

But I don't think the abusers are a tiny minority, I think they are a substantial minority, many of whom know full well what they are doing. A look around this forum, or many other social media outlets, will confirm this.
In my opinion it is doubtful if people who are going out on laning trips in heavily modified vehicles with huge tyres and equipped with massive winches, have any intention of driving within acceptable limits. Likewise if someone drives into a pool of water up to their door tops, I do not think they are fully expecting to get through without causing ground damage.

Like Boomer, my main concern is that driving byways in 4x4 remains possible in any form, I believe further restriction of byways either from national legislation or local modification is inevitable. :(
 
Good point and I shall explain...

There are many truck drivers including myself that were horrified at the prospect of having to pass a DCPC (Driver Certificate of Professional Competence) despite many of us knowing how to do our jobs perfectly well.

Without it, we would lose our right to work as a professional driver despite retaining a vocational licence - any driver stopped at a roadside check without one is off the road with immediate effect, insurance companies will not provide cover without evidence that the driver has DCPC qualification and companies are obliged to check that their drivers are qualified as a condition of retaining their goods vehicle operators licence.

If this system can be put into place then I do not see why a similar system can't be implemented (albeit on a much smaller scale) with a GCPC qualification.

There will be a degree of classroom training which includes map reading and being able to identify the different rights of way, along with an approved form of 'best practice' on their use, before being taken out onto the greenlane network as a group to be assessed and hopefully gaining the qualification.

Insurance companies can easily cancel any form of off-road cover until the GCPC is gained, just like they could with a heavy goods driver. It also means that there is no excuse for off piste play or ripping up the byways as you are now technically qualified - a series of hefty on the spot fines could prove as much a deterrent to rogue off-roaders as it has proved with rogue drivers.

Like the DCPC, the GCPC could have a two year 'grace' period in which to give sufficient time for everyone who wishes to carry on greenlaning an opportunity to gain the relevant certification.

Now tell me it's unworkable...
It's unworkable Because whilst every truck driver drives a truck not evry 4x4 owner drives on any roads that aren't tarmacced. Or are you suggesting that Panda 4x4, Audi Quasqui, X5 and evoke drivers be required to take this test??
 
It's unworkable Because whilst every truck driver drives a truck not evry 4x4 owner drives on any roads that aren't tarmacced. Or are you suggesting that Panda 4x4, Audi Quasqui, X5 and evoke drivers be required to take this test??

Not at all, this applies solely to those who choose to go off tarmac onto unsurfaced public rights of way for recreational use with their 4x4s.
You're supposedly an intelligent man Pikey so you would surely have already worked that out, but I also appreciate how you love to have a bit of a spat on a subject, we all do from time to time :rolleyes::D
 
I am working on something at the moment, you lot have just given me another idea

Thanks everyone :D
 
Back
Top