Rhode rover

Active Member

• Yesterday at 18:29

• #1

Hello all, in conjunction to a earlier post this week about replacing chassis parts I need to change direction. I really don't need parts I need a chassis. I've look around before and I think I want the Marshland for it's being closest original.
During the process of a chassis exchange does most everyone reuse existing components or start off fresh.
If my thinking is wrong about the chassis, please advise

 

codfather79

Well-Known Member

• Yesterday at 19:46

• #2

When I re chassis'ed Noel, I used a Richards chassis ()
And replaced all bushes, engine and gearbox mounts , brake pipes, clips/brackets etc with new.

 

A

Anaconda

Well-Known Member

• Yesterday at 19:47

• #3

Richards chassis I think.
Reuse what you can as many aftermarket parts are poor.

 

steve2286w

Well-Known Member

• Yesterday at 21:22

• #4

I’ve seen on here this choice of supplier and they export

LR Series 88 chassis 2.25 petrol & diesel - maer.com.pl

www.maer.com.pl

 

Rhode rover

Active Member

• Yesterday at 23:32

• #5

steve2286w said:

I’ve seen on here this choice of supplier and they export

LR Series 88 chassis 2.25 petrol & diesel - maer.com.pl

www.maer.com.pl

Click to expand...

 

Rhode rover

Active Member

• Yesterday at 23:37

• #6

Both the Richards and Marshland are available to me in the US pretty close to home.
Why would I choose one over the other?

Technically I could buy other nameless brand semi locally. A few hundred dollars cheaper but I'm not really interested, too afraid of poor workmanship.

 

W

Wildefalcon

Well-Known Member

• Today at 10:48

• #7

I think Marshland were the JLR OEM.
So there is that. Both are good enough.

Which is cheaper and available soonest?