L

Lukejpearson

New Member

• Mar 11, 2009

• #1

Has everyone seen the LRX then? Apparently LR will def be manufacturing it and we should see it out in 2010! I hope they keep the styling the same. What does everyone else think? I may have to speak nicely to the bank manager next year!

 

Mseries3

Well-Known Member

• Mar 12, 2009

• #2

Why is this in the freelander section? We don't know if it is going to be as bad as the freelander at the moment do we??

 

Trewey

Cockernee, Pasty munchin bastid.

• Mar 12, 2009

• #3

tis even gayer than the gaylander.

 

L

Lukejpearson

New Member

• Mar 12, 2009

• #4

Because apparently this is going to be the freelander version of the RR sport. hence in the freelander section. Makes a change to talk about something other than bloody faults...

 

The Mad Hat Man

Well-Known Member

LZIR Despatch Agent

• Mar 12, 2009

• #5

:nopics:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xURd6SLKQdw"]YouTube - Land Rover LRX Concept[/ame]
Is that just me - or was that salesspeak bull**** - it told you absolutely nothing.....?

forward and rearward visibility is crap.

here is the "what car" review..
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oNDtqEinsA&feature=related"]YouTube - What Car? TV: Readers rate new Land Rover concept[/ame]
reviewed by drivers of...
mini cooper in London
RR Sport in Paris
Audi Q7 in Essex
Volkswagon Toureg
I think that shows which market area it is aimed at !

 

Last edited: Mar 12, 2009

Chaser

New Member

• Mar 12, 2009

• #6

Treworgey 90 said:

tis even gayer than the gaylander.

Click to expand...

Got to agree, totally impractical pile of crap.

Might suit single posers with no kids and never have to carry anything.

Don't fancy having to lift my tool chest over that drop down tailgate!

 

Kernow nige

New Member

• Mar 12, 2009

• #7

Chaser said:

Got to agree, totally impractical pile of crap.

Might suit single posers with no kids and never have to carry anything.

Don't fancy having to lift my tool chest over that drop down tailgate!

Click to expand...

Seconded....looks an ugly bastid...an that rear end.....
makes me gaylander look totally .........bootiful ...

 

Northern Irelander

Well-Known Member

• Mar 13, 2009

• #8

LRX = epic failure

I'm a big fan of Jerry McGoverns early car designs such as the FL1, MGF, great looking cars but he's clearly lost the plot since becoming head of LR design team.

LRX to start at £25k..............I mean seriously, please

Plus LR are trying to market the hybrid version 120g CO2 as green, since when was permanent 4wd doing 70mph on the motorway eco friendly?

To the OP'er, RR sport!???? Do me a favour.

I don't refer to the FL as a gaylander, but if there is one LR model gayer than the FL that's the RR sport. All mouth and no trousers, next time look at the 2ft gap between front bumper and the rad.....bit of a facade.

Not to mention it's not a proper RR, and it looks as ugly as sin

 

Blippie

Well-Known Member

• Mar 17, 2009

• #9

The RRS is a road-biased Discovery 3 with a different body shell. OK, it looks chavvy but that is who it is aimed at.

It has the same feature as all the other models, i.e. it looks striking from every angle ecxept the rear, which was given to the YTS trainee to design.

However, they are awesome off road, if you remove the front bumper. If you don't remove the front bumper, don't worry, the ground will.

The LRX is basically a road biased version of the Freelander 2. I like the look of it and if I had £25k lying around we might replace our TD4 with one, as we have the 90 for offroading and need an economical 4x4 for my wife's business. Somehow I think the TD4 will be with us for years yet, though.

Cheers

Blippie