J

jpdal5921

Guest

• Aug 3, 2004

• #21

"JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
news:sstsg01p4lmh8qs98fscmlp61qofdpfvir@4ax.com...

<SNIP>

Abuse has been reported. abuse@clara.net

X-Complaints-To: abuse@clara.net (please include full headers)
X-Trace: b0496a6052c16161e6725a207851420744776804675076870142e056410e7918
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:25:44 +0100

 

S

scott

Guest

• Aug 3, 2004

• #22

"jpdal5921" <k@k.com> wrote in message
news:cenup7$b94$1@titan.btinternet.com
> "JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
> news:sstsg01p4lmh8qs98fscmlp61qofdpfvir@4ax.com...
>
> <SNIP>
>
> Abuse has been reported. abuse@clara.net

Oh grow up!

 

I

icarus

Guest

• Aug 4, 2004

• #23

jpdal,.... u are a very sad person. what the f+++ have u reported and to
whom ?

does it compensate for that small penis ?

 

D

Dan405

Guest

• Aug 4, 2004

• #24

"jpdal5921" <k@k.com> wrote in message
news:cenup7$b94$1@titan.btinternet.com...
>
> "JC" <johncalias-newsgroupsATyahooD0TcoD0Tuk> wrote in message
> news:sstsg01p4lmh8qs98fscmlp61qofdpfvir@4ax.com...
>
> <SNIP>
>

God you're cool...

--
Dan

 

S

Steve

Guest

• Aug 4, 2004

• #25

> Actually, I didn't know that...Where's your source???

The media over the last week or so. Dont want GPS ones banned, just the ones
that detect if RADAR is present in a camera or not.

> Also, they've wanted them banned for years and indeed, they used to be,
> until a court case ruled the govt's position untenable and made them
legal.

The have NEVER been banned cos they are a radar detecter per sey, only cos
they were said to intefere with a Radio signal. Was proved in the court case
that they didnt interfere with said radio signal and so legal to use. Radio
and telecomunications Act or something like that.

 

I

Ian Edwards

Guest

• Aug 5, 2004

• #26

Steve wrote:
>>Actually, I didn't know that...Where's your source???
>
>
> The media over the last week or so. Dont want GPS ones banned, just the ones
> that detect if RADAR is present in a camera or not.
>
>
>>Also, they've wanted them banned for years and indeed, they used to be,
>>until a court case ruled the govt's position untenable and made them
>
> legal.
>
> The have NEVER been banned cos they are a radar detecter per sey, only cos
> they were said to intefere with a Radio signal. Was proved in the court case
> that they didnt interfere with said radio signal and so legal to use. Radio
> and telecomunications Act or something like that.
>

Erm, not quite, see:-

http://www.speedcheetah.co.uk/legal_ruling.htm

--
Ian Edwards

 

S

Steve

Guest

• Aug 5, 2004

• #27

> > The have NEVER been banned cos they are a radar detecter per sey, only
cos
> > they were said to intefere with a Radio signal. Was proved in the court
case
> > that they didnt interfere with said radio signal and so legal to use.
Radio
> > and telecomunications Act or something like that.
> >
>
> Erm, not quite, see:-

Yep, I stand corrected but I was only making a very simplified comment on
legal jargon