Weight distribution

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

thetim

Well-Known Member
Posts
379
The vehicle I'm building is looking quite nose heavy (i.e. the front springs are a couple of inches more compressed than the rears at the moment; I've still got about 250kg to add to the rear but there's more stuff to go on the front too).

Anyone got experience of how weight distribution affects off-road ability? I'm really worried that it's just going to dig in at the front the first time it sees mud.
 
+1 what are you building.

You might need to get the axle weights weighed and alter the front rear spring rates.

But yes weight distribution will have an impact on an off road. Some pros and cons.
 
I'm building a cab-forward bobtail - build thread here: https://www.landyzone.co.uk/land-rover/frankentruck-lives.324682/
The front springs are softer than the rear (110) springs but not by a great deal. With hindsight, I should have located the spare wheel mounts just forward of the rear wheels rather than just aft of the front ones. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. The fuel tank is hugely robust and carries 100l of fuel, and will live behind the rear axle, but there aren't many other heavy things for the back end. At the moment I'm minded to accept it, for want of other options, raise the front with stiffer springs / spacers, and go to flotation tyres if it proves prone to sinking in.
 
I'm not a 90 or Disco expert, but on 110s the free lengths and diameters are different. I've spoken to a few spring manufacturers and not been too depressed by their small order pricing, and again, you might find them amenable to charity/pr.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top